User talk:Giro720

Friday 1 October 2021 19:11 UTC Welcome to my talk page. Archives: 1 2 3 4

Copyright status: File:Brasão de Armas Imperial (Lei Áurea).png

Copyright status: File:Brasão de Armas Imperial (Lei Áurea).png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Brasão de Armas Imperial (Lei Áurea).png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Princeza Imperial Regente (Lei Áurea).png
• File:Rodrigo Augusto da Silva (Lei Áurea).png

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 02:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Pavillon particulier d'Espagne (La connoissance des pavillons, Planche 61).jpg

Copyright status: File:Pavillon particulier d'Espagne (La connoissance des pavillons, Planche 61).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Pavillon particulier d'Espagne (La connoissance des pavillons, Planche 61).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Pavillon de Port à Port (La connoissance des pavillons, Planche 61).jpg
• File:Pavillon particulier d'Espagne (La connoissance des pavillons, Planche 61, aquarellée).jpg
• File:Pavillon de Port à Port (La connoissance des pavillons, Planche 61, aquarellée).jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Museu Histórico Nacional - Catálogo geral 1º seção archeologia e historia (1924).pdf

Copyright status: File:Museu Histórico Nacional - Catálogo geral 1º seção archeologia e historia (1924).pdf

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Museu Histórico Nacional - Catálogo geral 1º seção archeologia e historia (1924).pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 00:05, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Teimosa guerra de edições nesse ficheiro

Olá. Esse ficheiro que já havia sido corrigido para o padrão do livro oficial do governo do Brasil teve a correção revertida, pois um editor está querendo impor a própria escolha pessoal no caso.

Ele diz que reverteu com o argumento, a: "Bandeira revertida por ser mais histórica que as demais. Além disso, todos os videogames e todos os vídeos do YouTube sempre usaram esta bandeira, então não vejo razão para refazer a bandeira, que se tornou horrível, ao invés desta clássica. Então, vamos ficar com esta, pois é a bandeira mais histórica do Império do Brasil". Pelo jeito ele num é brasileiro ( e se baseia somente em games e no YouTube) e o verdadeiro motivo do referida padrão ser o mais usado no que ele chama de: todos os videogames e todos os vídeos do YouTube sempre usaram esta bandeira foi pelo fato de ter ficado muito tempo no ar( de 2006 a 2021) e nesses 15 anos o pessoal dos games, do youtube e todos mais[até mesmo os monarquistas kkk] apenas fizeram o tal do "Copia e cola". E quem vai copiar e colar num se liga na história correta ou em padrões heráldicos definidos em publicação oficial.

Favor tem como você participar da página de discussão sobre o tema e também chamar o editor guerrilheiro para a idem página? Por capricho pessoa o mesmo rejeita o livro oficial que tem o padrão mais brasileiro e que tem o mesmo formato de escudo que tá na Constituição de 1924 e também na base da Coroa de Dom Pedro I, além do nó em formato vermelho que vai contra o decreto do Tope Nacional do Brasil. Gente assim, talvez, só deixa a egolatria em página de discussão.

Penso que precisamos de algum editor com status de ADM para moderar o caso, esse ADM talvez possa ver isso: Yanguas--Almanaque Lusofonista (talk) 12:18, 25 August 2021 (UTC)